Hunan Guoci New Material Technology Co., Ltd.
Alumina (Al₂O₃) and zirconia (ZrO₂) ceramic rods are two of the most common high-performance cylindrical components made from industrial ceramic materials. Manufactured through high-temperature sintering and precision machining, they can replace traditional metal rods.
Ceramic rods are characterized by their ultra-high hardness, wear resistance, high-temperature resistance, and corrosion resistance. They are widely used in the medical, semiconductor, new energy, petrochemical, and other fields to address wear, corrosion, high-temperature, and insulation issues in harsh environments.
Zirconia ceramic rods are typically made from yttrium-stabilized zirconia (YSZ). Their most notable characteristic is their superior toughness, achieved through a "phase transformation toughening" mechanism.
Performance Comparison and Selection Guide
Features | Zirconia (ZrO₂) ceramic rod | Alumina (Al₂O₃) ceramic rod | Description and Impact |
---|---|---|---|
Toughness & flexural strength | Excellent (very high, reaching over 1200 MPa) | Good (typically around 300-400 MPa) | This is the core difference. Zirconia rods are more resistant to impact, bending and breaking, and have high reliability. |
Hardness | Excellent (Vickers hardness approximately 1250 HV) | Excellent (Vickers hardness approximately 1600-1800 HV) | Alumina has a higher absolute hardness and is more resistant to surface scratches, but zirconia has better overall wear resistance due to its good toughness. |
Wear Resistance | Excellent (due to the combination of high toughness and high hardness) | Excellent (primarily due to its high hardness) | Zirconia performs better under impact wear conditions; under pure sliding wear, both perform well. |
Density | High (≥6.0 g/cm³) | Medium (~3.6-3.9 g/cm³) | Zirconia rods are significantly heavier, which is an important consideration in dynamic applications (such as grinding media). |
Elastic modulus | High (~200 GPa) | Very High (~380 GPa) | Alumina is more rigid and less prone to bending and deformation. |
High temperature resistance | Good (long-term use < 800°C) | Excellent (long-term use <1600°C) | Alumina is structurally stable at high temperatures, making it the preferred material for high-temperature environments. |
Thermal conductivity | Low (~2 W/m·K) | Medium (~30 W/m·K) | Alumina has better thermal conductivity than zirconia. |
Coefficient of Thermal Expansion | High (close to some metals) | Medium | Zirconia also has better compatibility with metals, facilitating connections to metal parts. |
Insulation | Good | Excellent | Both are excellent insulators, with alumina having a slight advantage. |
Cost | Higher | Lower (Higher Cost-Effective) | Zirconia has higher raw material and sintering costs, but its longer lifespan may result in lower overall costs. |